I Am Not Saying Lewis is a Sellout

Bernie Sanders standing on the right during a protest over the university of Chicago's segregated housing policy in 1962.
Bernie Sanders standing on the right during a protest over the university of Chicago’s segregated housing policy in 1962.

I am not saying that John Lewis is a sellout, or that John Lewis is an Uncle Tom for “dropping the mic” on Bernie Sanders. Neither am I suggesting that Lewis is a liar as some have strongly intimated over recent comments he has made in support of the Clinton’s involvement in the civil rights movement during the 1960s. However, I do believe that John Lewis does not get to define who was or was not an active participant in the civil rights movement.

So what if Lewis did not meet Bernie Sanders on the civil rights trail? There are countless men and women, black and white, all over this country who participated in that movement for social justice who are faceless and nameless to history and to John Lewis.

Can Lewis rattle off the names of the women who stood over hot stoves to prepare meals for the marchers from Selma to Montgomery? Would Lewis even recognize any of them if shown a picture of them ? If by chance he could do either of these things, then, why has he not used his considerable clout to bring recognition to these people without whose support, the movement would not have received the success that history records.

Countless people who have never had their names in the press or whose deeds will never be recorded in history books participated in that glorious movement to weave Black Americans into the fabric of civil American society.

In 1962, my family and several other families in our church ( Bethel Christian Methodist Episcopal Church in Macon, Georgia), each hosted a Jesuit priest and a nun in our humble homes during the summer months. They were in Macon doing civil rights work.

Each family did so in spite of threats that their homes would be bombed. I dare say Lewis has no knowledge of the names of any of the people who opened their homes so that the work of the civil rights movement could be successful. Nonetheless, their contributions are just as important as the contributions of those persons that Lewis knew.

In 1965, I, along with several other Black young men integrated the Lanier Jr. High School in Macon, Georgia. All those lonely days, I never saw John Lewis. During all of the taunts, spit balls, and pushing and shoving, I never once saw John Lewis.  When the white boys wrote on the walls of the military science building, “Niggers Go Home or Die,”  I did not see Lewis. Yet, we had to find the courage to carry on in the face of this threat, if this grand idea of integrating American society was going to work.

Did I not have this experience because John Lewis was not there to witness it?

In 1986, John Lewis won a seat in the United States House of Representatives by eviscerating the civil rights legacy of the late Julian Bond. During that campaign, Lewis argued that he was the best Black person to represent Georgia’s Fifth Congressional District, because he was a harder worker than Bond back in their Students for Non-Violence Coordinating Committee (SNCC) days.

Lewis said that Bond was lazy, always late for civil rights activities and that they often had to rouse him out of bed in the morning to go stir up civil rights trouble. This was too much inside baseball. Bond had been a popular state legislator in Georgia politics and was nominated to run for Vice President at the 1968 Democratic National Convention. He was loved by Atlantans. Lewis destroyed him, sending Bond’s life into a tailspin; only Bond’s strength of character pulled him from utter failure. He rebounded, no thanks to Lewis; and served the civil rights community well as Chairman of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) and as a college professor lecturing on the subject of the civil rights movement for many years prior to his death last year.

Bond’s ashes were scattered in the waters of the Gulf of Mexico in a private ceremony that did not issue invitations to Lewis or any other of the so called Atlanta civil rights elite.

In 2014, Lewis had an opportunity to help elect Georgia’s first Black senator, former State Senator Steen Miles. Miles would not only have been Georgia’s first Black Senator, she would also have been the state’s’ first woman of any racial hue to be elected senator. Lewis opted instead to support, Michelle Nunn, daughter of former Georgia Senator, Sam Nunn; in spite of the fact that Nunn had virtually no ties to Georgia and preached an ultra conservative Democratic platform.

Lewis, along with several other prominent civil rights icons flooded South Georgia with robocalls during the closing days of the Democratic Primary battle. Miles, operating on a shoestring budget succumbed to the sheer weight of those robocalls.

Miles grew up in South Bend, Indiana as the walls of segregation started tumbling down. Her role in the movement was to apply for careers that to that point in time, had not been charted for Black Americans. She rolled up her sleeves and muscled her way into the news industry, first as a reporter and eventually becoming a News Producer at WXIA-TV in Atlanta. An investigative piece of journalism she reported in 1976 about a grocery store in the Chicago area selling spoiled milk, led the Food and Drug Administration to require date labels on all perishable food items.

So what if Lewis had not met Steen Miles back in 1976? He would probably argue that back in the day, he met the conservative Democrat Sam Nunn.

It was a big movement, John, and you sir, do not get to define who is worthy to speak about contributions which did not occur in your presence.





Harold Michael Harvey is an American novelist and essayist, the author of Paper puzzle and Justice in the Round. He can be contacted at haroldmichaelharvey.com.



We’d love to keep you updated with our latest news and offers 😎

We don’t spam! Read our [link]privacy policy[/link] for more info.

Published by Michael

Harold Michael Harvey is a Past President of The Gate City Bar Association and is the recipient of the Association’s R. E. Thomas Civil Rights Award. He is the author of Paper Puzzle and Justice in the Round: Essays on the American Jury System, and a two-time winner of Allvoices’ Political Pundit Prize. His work has appeared in Facing South, The Atlanta Business Journal, The Southern Christian Leadership Conference Magazine, Southern Changes Magazine, Black Colleges Nines, and Medium.

12 replies on “I Am Not Saying Lewis is a Sellout”

  1. Extremely well written and eloquently stated; I could not agree more. For me, this is just the latest in a long series of disappointing self-revelations by Congressman John Lewis. It is long since time for Mr. Lewis to retire.

  2. Brother Harvey, so on point. A fellow Maconite, Wallace “Winifred” “Hotoda” “Bo” Francis, who attended Ballard-Hudson, became a member of the BPP in California making significant contributions before and after joining. Once a colleague and I tried to assist him in a speaking engagement at Cornell with the legendary Dr. James Cone. His response to us: “Would I know him?”. It seems only the rich and or famous need assert their movement bona fides. Thankfully historians have learned there are unsung heroes and heroines of the movement. Dr. Cones response and dismissiveness remind me of Lewis’
    foolish statement. A sad commentary indeed. Says a lot about the man that his comments would be solicited in such a fraudulent and sordid way to mislead the very people he claims to lead and to represent. Perhaps he lost his way in the journey.

    1. Mr. Penn, Dr. Cone would not know me either. He left Tuskegee University within months of my arrival on campus on August 20, 1970. We never had the pleasure to me. I am familiar with his work and surprised to learn of his response.
      Rep. Lewis is my good neighbor and it was very difficult to pen this piece. I felt I had to speak up for the untold thousands of people who worked during the civil rights area, whose contributions have never been documented. In my writings I attempt to tell as many of their stories as I can. I history is much richer than that of civil rights icon who get paraded out to tell this limited version of our story.

    1. It was not easy expression myself on this one, as Rep. Lewis is my good neighbor. But I felt compelled to raise my voice in the face of changing the historical narrative to fit contemporary political objectives.

  3. Well done Mr. Harvey! I wholeheartedly agree with your point of emphasis. It is the audacity to think that one person’s contribution to any movement is more important than any other’s. Or that because it missed his field of vision Mr. Lewis would dare to say that Bernie was not involved. It does make me wonder, since it seems that we went through this same thing when Sen.Obama was running for President: why does Sen. Lewis continue to champion Clinton with such passion? It appears that he is again not listening to the will of the people that he represents.

    1. Your points are well taken Ms. Grant. It appears that Rep. Lewis will be late to join the Sanders bandwagon as he was in jumping aboard the Obama train eight years ago.

  4. Without diminishing his contribution to the cause, protesting segregated housing in Chicago is not the same as protesting on the front lines in the South in the 60s, as Bernie tries to insinuate he was a part of.

    1. It takes great courage to protest injustice anywhere. The most difficult time Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. had was when he attempted to integrate housing in Chicago. Chicago is one place he was not successful. King said he could not believe the hatred that was hurled at him and those who demonstrated with him. All service is worthy and we do a disservice to the movement for justice and equality when we attempt to place a particular aspect of service on a pedal and say that other service does not measure up.

  5. Lewis is not unlike the corrupt dictators of Africa, Asia and Europe. What a useless waste of space in congress. Uncle Tom is an appropriate association to his tenure in the House. You could also label him a House n__ger.

Comments are closed.